normal phenotype
• homozygotes are viable and fertile with no discernible phenotypes
|
Allele Symbol Allele Name Allele ID |
Bmp2tm1Jfm targeted mutation 1, James F Martin MGI:3583785 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary |
16 genotypes
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• homozygotes are viable and fertile with no discernible phenotypes
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• compound heterozygous mutant mice are viable, fertile and phenotypically normal
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
N |
• the size of the first branchial arch is normal at E10.5
|
N |
• the size of the first branchial arch is normal at E10.5
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• no embryos are found after E12.5
|
• dramatic reduction in the amount of sarcomeric myosin
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• although present at the expected Mendelian frequency at E9.5, all mutant embryos exhibit heart failure at E10.5
|
• by E10.5, mutant embryos exhibit a severely compromised myocardium
|
• at E9.5, all mutant embryos, including those with cardiac jelly deposition, fail to undergo epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in the forming AV endocardial cushions
|
• at E9.5, 43% of mutants fail to expand the space between the myocardium and the endocardium, indicating defective cardiac jelly formation
|
• at E9.5, mutant embryos display abnormal AV canal constriction
|
• by E10.5, all mutant embryos exhibit pericardial effusion
|
• by E10.5, all mutant embryos appear growth retarded
|
• by E10.5, all mutant embryos appear growth retarded
|
• by E10.5, all mutant embryos exhibit pericardial effusion
|
• by E10.5, mutant embryos exhibit a severely compromised myocardium
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• drastic reduction in most cranial neural crest derived bones
|
• enlarged frontal fontanelle at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• pieces of the interparietal bone are absent
|
• mandibular defects at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• drastic reduction in most cranial neural crest derived bones
|
• enlarged frontal fontanelle at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• pieces of the interparietal bone are absent
|
• mandibular defects at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• decreased size
|
• decreased size
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• drastic reduction in most cranial neural crest derived bones
|
• enlarged frontal fontanelle at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• pieces of the interparietal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the squamosal bone are absent
|
• mandibular defects at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• decreased size
|
• pieces of the condyloid process are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• drastic reduction in most cranial neural crest derived bones
|
• enlarged frontal fontanelle at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• pieces of the interparietal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the squamosal bone are absent
|
• mandibular defects at E18.5
• phenotype is more severe than in conditional null mice wild-type for Bmp2
|
• decreased size
|
• pieces of the condyloid process are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• missing pieces
|
• missing pieces
|
• missing pieces
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• decreased size
|
• missing pieces
|
• decreased size
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• pieces of the interparietal bone are absent
|
• decreased size
|
• pieces of the condyloid process are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the interparietal bone are absent
|
• decreased size
|
• pieces of the condyloid process are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
• pieces of the nasal bone are absent
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• mice die at birth as a result of a severe cleft palate defect
|
N |
• neural crest-derived cell migration, cell proliferation and apoptosis of palatal mesenchyme is unaffected
|
• newborns exhibit multiple craniofacial malformations typical of Pierre Robin sequence in humans
|
• severe defects with a significantly reduced size of craniofacial bones, including a ~40% reduction in zygomatic volume
|
• Meckels cartilage is significantly smaller in size
|
• smaller zygomatic process of squamous bone
|
• maxillomandibular hypoplasia
|
• coronoid process of the mandibular bone is missing
|
• smaller and shorter jaw
• further analysis showed significant reduction in cell proliferation and differentiation of osteogenic progenitors in the mandible, contributing to micrognathia
|
• ~10% reduction in mandibular bone length
|
• smaller zygomatic process of the maxilla
|
• failed elevation of palatal shelves at E14.5
• palate shelves remain in the vertical position at E16.5
• however, no differences in cell proliferation or apoptosis are observed in the developing palatal shelves at E13.5
• in vitro, palatal shelves are able to elevate after 24 h in roller culture (when the mandible is removed) and to fuse after 72 h in organ culture, indicating that failed palatal shelf elevation is due to steric hindrance by the undescended tongue
|
• newborns exhibit complete cleft palate due to failed palatal shelf elevation
|
• at E14.5, tongue position is significantly higher along the anterior-posterior axis
• however, tongue volume is not significantly altered at E13.5 and E14.5, and elevated tongue is not a consequence of increased cell proliferation or abnormal muscle patterning
|
• severe defects with a significantly reduced size of craniofacial bones, including a ~40% reduction in zygomatic volume
|
• Meckels cartilage is significantly smaller in size
|
• smaller zygomatic process of squamous bone
|
• maxillomandibular hypoplasia
|
• coronoid process of the mandibular bone is missing
|
• smaller and shorter jaw
• further analysis showed significant reduction in cell proliferation and differentiation of osteogenic progenitors in the mandible, contributing to micrognathia
|
• ~10% reduction in mandibular bone length
|
• smaller zygomatic process of the maxilla
|
• failed elevation of palatal shelves at E14.5
• palate shelves remain in the vertical position at E16.5
• however, no differences in cell proliferation or apoptosis are observed in the developing palatal shelves at E13.5
• in vitro, palatal shelves are able to elevate after 24 h in roller culture (when the mandible is removed) and to fuse after 72 h in organ culture, indicating that failed palatal shelf elevation is due to steric hindrance by the undescended tongue
|
• newborns exhibit complete cleft palate due to failed palatal shelf elevation
|
• at E14.5, tongue position is significantly higher along the anterior-posterior axis
• however, tongue volume is not significantly altered at E13.5 and E14.5, and elevated tongue is not a consequence of increased cell proliferation or abnormal muscle patterning
|
• failed elevation of palatal shelves at E14.5
• palate shelves remain in the vertical position at E16.5
• however, no differences in cell proliferation or apoptosis are observed in the developing palatal shelves at E13.5
• in vitro, palatal shelves are able to elevate after 24 h in roller culture (when the mandible is removed) and to fuse after 72 h in organ culture, indicating that failed palatal shelf elevation is due to steric hindrance by the undescended tongue
|
• newborns exhibit complete cleft palate due to failed palatal shelf elevation
|
• at E14.5, tongue position is significantly higher along the anterior-posterior axis
• however, tongue volume is not significantly altered at E13.5 and E14.5, and elevated tongue is not a consequence of increased cell proliferation or abnormal muscle patterning
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
• decreased size
|
• decreased size
|
|
|
♀ | phenotype observed in females |
♂ | phenotype observed in males |
N | normal phenotype |
Mouse Genome Database (MGD), Gene Expression Database (GXD), Mouse Models of Human Cancer database (MMHCdb) (formerly Mouse Tumor Biology (MTB)), Gene Ontology (GO) |
||
Citing These Resources Funding Information Warranty Disclaimer, Privacy Notice, Licensing, & Copyright Send questions and comments to User Support. |
last database update 11/12/2024 MGI 6.24 |
|
|